A foreign family office arrived with thirteen Cyprus entities already in place. The funding across the group sat as a web of intercompany balances and shareholder loans, and each related-party flow was supported by its own transfer pricing study. The structure functioned. It was also expensive to maintain. And the funding it carried was earning no notional deduction, because the Cyprus Notional Interest Deduction under Article 9B of the Income Tax Law N.118(I)/2002 is available only on new equity, not on debt.
The recommendation, once the group was mapped, was short. Consolidate the intercompany balances. Capitalise the funding to the extent Article 9B and the anti-abuse provisions in it permit. Two consequences follow. The transfer pricing studies that documented the eliminated balances cease to be required. The contributions that replace those balances can qualify as new equity, and become eligible for the NID. The rest of this article sets out the framework that permits that route, the limits that bind it, and the circumstances in which the analysis still points to debt.
What Article 9B actually does
The Notional Interest Deduction is provided under Article 9B of the Income Tax Law N.118(I)/2002, as amended, introduced by Law 18(I)/2015. It allows a Cyprus tax resident company, or a permanent establishment in Cyprus of a non-Cyprus tax resident company, to claim a notional deduction on new equity introduced on or after 1 January 2015 and used in the business.
The reference rate is the 10-year government bond yield of the country in which the new equity is invested, as at 31 December of the preceding tax year, increased by 5%. The applicable rates are published annually by the Cyprus Tax Department.
Following the Cyprus tax reform enacted on 31 December 2025, the corporate income tax rate is 15% with effect from 1 January 2026. Where the NID is available and the 80% cap applies, the effective rate on the taxable profit attributable to the new equity falls to 3%. The 2026 reform also strengthened the General Anti-Abuse Rule in the Income Tax Law and introduced further anti-abuse provisions addressing arrangements that lack genuine economic substance or commercial purpose.
What counts as new equity
For the purposes of Article 9B, new equity comprises paid-up share capital and share premium introduced on or after 1 January 2015 in respect of shares of any class, including ordinary, preference, redeemable and convertible shares.
The contribution may be made in cash or in kind. Where it is made in kind, the qualifying amount cannot exceed the market value of the asset contributed. The conversion of a non-refundable capital contribution into issued share capital on or after 1 January 2015 also qualifies.
Share capital, share premium or reserves that existed at 31 December 2014 do not qualify, whether retained as such or capitalised later. The previous treatment that permitted capitalised pre-2015 reserves to qualify in certain cases was removed with effect from 1 January 2021.
What the NID reduces
The NID is a deduction from Cyprus corporate income tax. It reduces the tax on the profit that is both subject to corporate income tax and attributable to the new equity. It does not reduce any other Cyprus tax, and it does not attach to income that sits outside the corporate income tax base.
Many Cyprus companies in international structures earn income that sits outside that base. Dividend income received by a Cyprus tax resident company is generally exempt from corporate income tax and is dealt with under the Special Defence Contribution regime, which has its own exemptions. Gains on the disposal of shares and other qualifying titles are exempt from corporate income tax, and in most cases from any other Cyprus tax. Gains on Cyprus-situated immovable property fall under the separate Capital Gains Tax regime, which the NID does not reduce.
Where an entity's income is primarily exempt dividends or qualifying gains, there is no corporate income tax base for the NID to attach to. The NID on such an entity is nil, however much new equity is introduced. The instrument question, for an entity of that profile, has to be resolved on grounds other than the NID.
The cap, the loss rule and the election
The NID is capped at 80% of the taxable profit generated by the new equity before the deduction. It cannot create or increase a tax loss. Any NID that is restricted by the 80% cap or by the loss restriction is not carried forward to subsequent tax years. A taxpayer may also elect, in respect of any tax year, not to claim all or part of the NID that would otherwise be available.
The cap is what governs the economics. At the headline rate of 15% applying from 1 January 2026, an 80% NID leaves 20% of the relevant profit taxable, producing an effective rate of 3% on that profit. Below the cap, the NID is taken in full. Above it, the balance is lost, not deferred.
The provisions that prevent duplication
Article 9B contains specific anti-abuse provisions that sit alongside the General Anti-Abuse Rule of the Income Tax Law. Three of them matter in practice.
Where the new equity of a Cyprus company derives, directly or indirectly, from the new equity of another company, the NID is available to only one of those companies in respect of that equity. The same contribution cannot produce a deduction twice within a group. For a group with circulating intercompany balances, this is the rule that determines which entity receives the capitalisation.
Where the new equity derives, directly or indirectly, from funds on which another company has claimed an interest deduction for Cyprus tax purposes, the NID is reduced by the amount of that interest expense. A deduction for actual interest and a notional deduction on the same funds cannot be stacked.
Where the new equity arises in the course of a reorganisation falling within the reorganisation provisions of the Income Tax Law, the new equity is determined as if the reorganisation had not taken place. A reorganisation is neutral for this purpose. It does not convert pre-2015 equity into new equity, and it does not reset the clock.
Why a shareholder loan earns nothing
A shareholder loan does not constitute new equity within the meaning of Article 9B. Funding advanced as debt, rather than introduced as paid-up share capital or share premium, gives rise to no NID for any year in which it remains outstanding as a loan. This is the position in which the thirteen-entity group above had been sitting.
The NID is available only in respect of new equity, which comprises paid-up share capital and share premium introduced on or after 1 January 2015. A shareholder loan does not give rise to an NID deduction in respect of that funding.
Interest actually paid on a shareholder loan may still be deductible for corporate income tax purposes where it meets the general conditions under Section 11 of the Income Tax Law, and subject to the interest limitation rule transposing Article 4 of Council Directive (EU) 2016/1164 (ATAD). The NID is a separate and distinct deduction. It is calculated on equity, not on debt, and the two regimes do not compensate for each other.
Returning the equity to the shareholder
Equity introduced into a Cyprus company is not permanently locked in. Where the shareholder wishes to recover it, the applicable mechanism is a reduction of share capital under Sections 64 to 68 of the Companies Law, Cap. 113.
The statutory steps are a special resolution of the shareholders, requiring at least 75% of the votes cast by members entitled to vote; confirmation of the reduction by the District Court in which the company has its registered office; and filing of the court order and the minute of reduction with the Registrar of Companies. The reduction takes effect on registration. The steps above are more involved than the repayment of a loan. They are, however, procedural. Each has a defined form and a predictable timetable, and in a properly run file the reduction completes without sitting heavily on the company.
When debt is still the right answer
There are circumstances in which a shareholder loan, not an equity contribution, is the correct instrument.
The first is where the company is not expected to generate taxable profit attributable to the funding. An example is a holding company whose intended return takes the form of a gain on disposal that is not subject to Cyprus income tax. Without taxable profit, the NID has nothing to attach to.
The second is where the duration of the funding is short or uncertain. A capital reduction carries cost and process. A loan repayment does not.
The third is where commercial or regulatory considerations make equity less appropriate. Not every structure benefits from the NID, and the instrument that does not qualify is sometimes the instrument that fits.
The analysis sits within the broader question of how Cyprus structures are funded and what substance they carry, including the anti-tax-avoidance rules transposed from Council Directive (EU) 2016/1164 (ATAD) and the General Anti-Abuse Rule, as strengthened by the 2026 tax reform. The appropriate treatment depends on the facts: the expected quantum and timing of taxable profit, the duration of the funding, the nature of the anticipated return, and the anti-abuse provisions that apply.
The outcome for the thirteen
After the restructuring, the group carries fewer intercompany balances, and with them fewer transfer pricing studies. The equity contributions that replaced the eliminated debt qualify, where the facts support it, as new equity within the meaning of Article 9B. Subject to the specific anti-abuse provisions, and in particular the rule that new equity deriving, directly or indirectly, from the new equity of another Cyprus company is counted once across the group, the NID is available on that funding.
Within the 80% cap, the NID reduces the tax on the profit attributable to the new equity. Where the calculated NID would otherwise exceed 80% of that profit, the cap binds and the effective rate on the profit is 3% against the 15% headline corporate income tax rate in force from 1 January 2026. Where profitability is high enough that the cap does not bind, the NID is taken in full and the effective rate on the profit sits between 3% and 15%, depending on the ratio of NID to profit. The running cost of the structure, measured across annual compliance and the transfer pricing documentation that the prior intercompany balances required, is materially lower than the position the group inherited.
The logic is not elaborate. Article 9B provides a notional deduction on new equity. The group had been funding its Cyprus entities as debt. Consolidating the balances and introducing equity, where the facts supported it, converted a feature of the annual cost of maintenance into the tax position the statute makes available, within the cap, the loss restriction, and the anti-abuse provisions that Article 9B itself sets.